We recently attended the eTail Nordic show in Copenhagen, Denmark.
In preparation for my keynote address, I did some research into the Nordic email marketing landscape. Using insights from Validity’s MailCharts brand intelligence solution, I created a performance benchmark based on email programs in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden.
While there are many similarities with programs around the world, there are also striking differences:
In my presentation, I encouraged audiences to start their email optimization by thinking like mailbox providers (MBPs). All the big MBP names like Microsoft, Yahoo, and Gmail offer excellent deliverability guidance. And, many of the most important recommendations are common across all of them. Here are some Scandi-specific illustrations that bring these best practices to life.
All MBP guidance essentially comes down to one simple concept—don’t look like a spammer! Postmasters have no problem with legitimate email marketing. Their primary focus is protecting their customers from malicious messages. So, when your emails look suspicious you will get filtered to spam.
During my research, I signed up with Nordgreen’s email program. Unfortunately, the welcome email went to my spam folder, and Gmail’s explanation was: It is similar to messages that were identified as spam in the past.
This is bad news for the sender—you never get a second chance to make a great first impression. We’ve done previous research showing when the first message fails to generate engagement, there is already a >50 percent chance the sender will never see any future engagement from the subscriber. The cost of acquiring that new subscriber has been wasted, as have any future revenue opportunities.
Reputation matters (wherever you are)!
Having a good sender reputation is important. It’s like a credit score for email marketing programs, and it strongly influences how MBPs see email senders and whether they accept their emails.
While I was speaking with the team from high-end fashion retailer By Malene Birger, I looked up their score at www.senderscore.org. A best practice email program should be scoring above 90, so they were concerned to learn their score was only 80.
We used Everest to diagnose the issue and quickly identified the authentication and block listing problems that were dragging their score down.
They also send from shared IP addresses. While this isn’t a bad practice in itself, it means their reputation is dependent on other senders, whose commitment to best practices may be weaker.
MBPs expect email senders to take responsibility for sourcing valid email addresses from new sign-ups. They also recommend a strong permissioning model, which requiring positive opt-in, and a confirmation email to activate the registration.
Consumer electronics retailer Elkjøp practices both of these principles. However, when testing for address structure, I saw their address validation accepts invalid domains—creating the risk of high bounce rates. A real-time validation solution like BriteVerify would help solve this problem.