I recently presented a webinar for the AMA entitled “Building Reputation and Spurring Engagement in the Age of Social and Mobile.” You can listen to the recording. We had a great attendance, and didn’t have the opportunity to answer all of the audience questions. I promised the listeners I would follow-up in a blog post, so as promised; here are the answers to your questions.
In both of these cases, the email will be reported into Microsoft via their proprietary filter, Smart Screen. Smart Screen is used by most of Microsoft products like Internet Explorer, Windows Live Hotmail, Exchange, and Outlook. When reporting mail as junk in Outlook, the sending IP and content will be delivered to Smart Screen to use in their filtering decisions. It does not work like it does with Windows Live Hotmail where you will also receive a copy of that complaint if you are enrolled in their Junk Mail Report Program.
Embedded video isn’t supported by most mail clients or ISPs, with the exception of HMTL5 video in Apple devices like the iPod Touch, iPad and iPhone. Marketers generally employ a couple of workarounds for this. One is to display a still image from the video with a “play” icon on the image that is linked to the video. Most subscribers are conditioned to click on this to play the video which will then open the video in their browser. Animated gifs are another possible solution that I’ve seen everyone from Urban Outfitters to West Elm use with great success, and it’s supported by all major webmail providers and ISPs. If your video is on YouTube, you can include the link within your email and it will play within the inbox at Gmail, Yahoo, and Hotmail. You may also want to consider using a third party service like Liveclicker.
Yes, there are ways to do this and I’ve seen Return Path partner Sympact do this with Starbucks. Another third party to look at for geo-location is Movable Ink. Not only do they do geo-targeting in email, but they also do auto-optimization of your content based on real-time response rates, effectively throwing out lengthy split A/B tests and allowing marketers to test and optimize while simultaneously sending out a campaign.
I predict that use will pick up as more and more consumers use smart phones and become aware of the technology. QR codes have been around for almost 20 years now, mainly used for inventory purposes, but businesses have been using it to really connect analog content to the digital realm. For example, a magazine ad can print a QR code that will direct people to their website, or a book may include a QR code that may redirect to further digital content.
I agree with Wieneke that it will be supplanted in the near term by near field communication chips for data acquisition. Rumor is that it will be included in the iPhone 5 which means people can share email addresses at POS, conferences, etc, easily through their phone. Best of all, the email address will be accurate!
I wouldn’t recommend, as some people do, including QR codes in emails themselves. I don’t see the point of adding another distracting call to action within an email, and I also get awful images of people taking pictures of a QR code on their phone with their other phone. It just isn’t going to happen.
According to our latest Return Path study, content comes in third place after reputation and infrastructure as a reason for deliverability issues. Past studies have also confirmed that deliverability problems are due to content 17% of the time. So yes, content is still important, but it’s more about using the right mix of text and HTML, avoiding blatant tricks to avoid spam filters, and well formed HTML. Additionally, most content issues I see come from third party URLs that have a bad reputation associated with it, which I guess all comes back to reputation again.
Do you have more questions about reputation and engagement? Leave them in the comments below!