A Rose By Any Other Name: Distracting Us From Our Real Problem

I disagree with the EEC’s efforts to redefine the methods marketers – and the industry as a whole – use to track email marketing behaviors. While changing the terminology from “open rate” to “render rate” may be a more accurate reflection of the measurement, a new name is simply a distraction from the real issue: accurate measurement of the impact of the email channel.

There are a number of challenges email marketers face every day to compile any sort of reporting on the performance of their program, including:

  • Appending data from multiple, various sources (such as delivery reports, click tracking, web analytics, internal purchase/conversion data)
  • Abuse of email-only coupons through deal sites that skew response data
  • Tracking subscriber response in offline channels
  • Technical errors that under-report link-tracking data

These challenges not only make it difficult to compile full response data for program performance analysis, but inherently have discord between them. For example: what the ESP provides as clicks may not match up to the number of link visits reported by the web analytics tool. This forces the marketers to use the available data as directional indicators – and not precise measurements of subscriber behavior.

Therefore, implementing a complicated algorithm that may be a fraction more accurate for a single metric (opens or renders, in this case), will not greatly impact the overall analytics picture for the marketer. And, in fact, would most likely serve to add greater stress to the already thinly-stretched marketer, as they attempt to gather more detailed reporting data (such as separating clickers-only from openers-and-clickers) in order to perform the calculation.

So, while theoretically it sounds like a good practice to be more accurate in measuring these “Total Unique Action Values,” the impact would be negligible, at best. When used in combination with other metrics, marketers would still need to apply a directional approach for measuring business impact due to the broad and ever-present challenges faced in capturing the total response an email creates.

Agree with Bonnie? Share your views on the EEC blog.

minute read

Popular stories

Products

BriteVerify

BriteVerify email verification ensures that an email address actually exists in real-time

DemandTools

The #1 global data quality tool used by thousands of Salesforce admins

Everest

Insights and deliverability guidance from the only all-in-one email marketing solution

GridBuddy Cloud

Transform how you interact with your data through the versatility of grids.

Return Path

World-class deliverability applications to optimize email marketing programs

Trust Assessments

A revolutionary new solution for assessing Salesforce data quality

Solutions

Validity for Email

Increase inbox placement and maximize subscriber reach with clean and actionable data

Validity for Data Management

Simplify data management with solutions that improve data quality and increase CRM adoption

Validity for Sales Productivity

Give your sales team back hours per day with tools designed to increase productivity and mitigate pipeline risks in real-time